By Jose Hermosa
A former UK Supreme Court judge who strongly questions the CCP ( Chinese Communist Party) Virus lockdowns, predicts that these could be extended for up to 10 years, despite being inhumane and an expression of totalitarianism.
Lord Sumption warns that the so-called social controls caused by the virus pandemic can be maintained by the government for up to a decade, given the intolerant conformism of part of the citizens, according to Summit News of March 26.
“It’s politically unrealistic to expect the Government to backtrack now,” he reiterated, referring to the advantage gained by politicians in imposing mandatory quarantines around the world.
He also cited as an example of long restrictions the food rationing to which the British were subjected to for nine years after World War II.
Based on this historical precedent, Lord Sumption warned that in the case of the CCP Virus the lockdown could be extended even longer, even for a decade, for example.
“An interesting parallel is the continuation of wartime food rationing after the last war. People were in favor of that because they were in favor of social control,” he said during a “Sketch notes on” podcast.
Sumption is one of the UK’s most decorated jurists, and has shown decisiveness by presenting to citizens the adverse effects of the closures that have caused so much suffering, as he sees it.
The UK is one of the countries that has enforced pandemic restrictions most rigorously.
In fact, it is now arguing that its provisions will continue to apply until everyone has been vaccinated, with an unknown deadline, but one that will last several years.
After the health authorities imposed limitations until June 2020, on March 25 they extended them until October, but the Minister of Health, Matt Hancock, did not define when they would end, very much in the sense of the risk Sumption warned about.
The measure imposed by the government, about anyone vacationing abroad could receive a fine of about $7,000 infuriated the British people.
No one may “leave England to travel to a destination outside the UK, or travel to, or be present at, a point of embarkation for the purpose of traveling from there to a destination outside the UK, without a reasonable excuse,” the rule contains, Express reported on March 23.
Sumption denounced the attitude with which people who, like him, dissent from the extreme measures taken by governments are treated.
He commented that they are “subjected to an extraordinarily unpleasant campaign of personal abuse.” “I know a lot of people that would prefer not to put their head above the parapet.”
He also added about his personal case, “From the very moment I started to make these points I began to get emails from politicians who agreed with what I had to say but that they themselves didn’t dare to speak out. That I think is a very serious state of affairs.”
He also rejected the use of police force to repress those who did not follow the official narrative, “People ought to be entitled to voice their differences (of opinion,” he said.
And he also commented, “If the only way you can enforce distancing is by beating people over the head with truncheons then it’s not worth it.”
Source: TheBL
RELATED:
RELATED:
Foreign Affairs Intelligence Council 