Pentagon Chief overrules Biden’s orders!

Fake President
Fake President

By Brenda Brown

The National Guard chief tried to remove 2,280 troops from the nation’s capital, but Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin was overridden.

Fox News shared a memo where we saw that National Guard chief Daniel R. Hokanson, a four-star general, ordered the troops to be removed because of a mission “overstretch” and the “indefinite existence” of the DC security assignment.

“I am worried that the indefinite existence of this requirement will hinder our ability to staff future missions, as both adjutants general and guardsmen will be unable to commit to future missions,”– stated Hokanson.

Exclusive report from @GillianHTurner – Top General of the National Guard opposed keeping troops in DC but was overturned by Biden administration

— johnny dollar (@johnnydollar01) March 11, 2021

The general said that he is concerned about sustaining lower troop levels in DC.

In the memo, we can read: “efforts to date have failed to secure enough volunteers among supporting states to meet the USCP request of 2,280 soldiers, nor Option B of 1000 soldiers.”

According to the National Guard Chief Hokanson, the troops are already limited because of the pandemic situation and restrictions, civil disturbances.

Gillian Anderson from Fox News shared a copy of the memo, and you can see it below.

#EXCLUSIVE official government memo obtained by #FOXNEWS shows #NATIONALGUARD chief laying out case that guard NOT EQUIPPED to carry out mission in DC to protect the #Capitol— dissents from Pentagon decision to continue the mission

— Gillian Turner (@GillianHTurner) March 11, 2021

Full text Military News: The True Reporter

2021 Joe Biden Executive Orders

U.S. intelligence officials say Chinese government is collecting Americans’ DNA

Chinese government is collecting Americans DNA
Chinese government is collecting Americans DNA


60 Minutes has learned Chinese company BGI Group, the largest biotech firm in the world, offered to build COVID labs in at least six states, and U.S. intelligence officials issued warnings not to share health data with BGI. See the story, Sunday on CBS. The largest biotech firm in the world wasted no time in offering to build and run COVID testing labs in Washington, contacting its governor right after the first major COVID outbreak in the U.S. occurred there. The Chinese company, the BGI Group, made the same offer to at least five other states, including New York and California, 60 Minutes has learned.

This, along with other COVID testing offers by BGI, so worried Bill Evanina, then the country’s top counterintelligence officer, that he authorized a rare public warning. “Foreign powers can collect, store and exploit biometric information from COVID tests” declared the notice. Evanina believes the Chinese are trying to collect Americans’ DNA to win a race to control the world’s biodata.

Jon Wertheim speaks to Evanina and others for an investigation into how personal data, particularly biodata, has become a precious commodity and in the wrong hands, poses threats to national security and the economy. Wertheim’s two-part report will be broadcast on 60 Minutes Sunday, January 31, at 7 p.m. ET/PT on CBS.  

Thanks partially to Evanina’s efforts, none of the states accepted the offer of the BGI Group, which he says has close ties to China’s military and ruling Communist Party. “This shows the nefarious mindset of the Communist Party of China, to take advantage of a worldwide crisis like COVID,” says Evanina. A veteran of the FBI and the CIA, he recently stepped down, but not before sounding the alarm. “We put out an advisory to not only every American, but to hospitals, associations, and clinics. Knowing that BGI is a Chinese company, do we understand where that data’s going?

One worry for Evanina and others is control over biodata that can lead to the complete control over health care: if a person’s current or future medical condition is known through DNA and other data, the entity that knows it can gain a monopoly over the therapy or drugs to treat them. “From a long-term existential cost to our nation, do we want to do that? Do we want to have another nation systematically eliminate our health care services?” asks Evanina. “That’s what’s happening.”   

This is already happening on a smaller scale; the U.S. is almost entirely dependent on China to furnish the PPE it uses to combat the pandemic. The future could look a lot worse says Edward You, a former biochemist turned supervisory special agent in the FBI. “What happens if we realize that all of our future drugs, our future vaccines… are all completely dependent upon a foreign source? If we don’t wake up, we’ll realize one day we’ve just become health care crack addicts and someone like China has become our pusher,” he tells Wertheim.  

There are potentially other ways for China or other foreign powers to obtain the DNA of Americans. Millions of Americans have voluntarily given their DNA away when they used the services of genealogy companies to learn their ancestry. There is a lot that can happen to their DNA and most donors are not fully aware of the potential risks, bioethicists say. The genealogy companies can have partnerships with biotech firms to share that data, in the interest of developing treatments. Evanina says Chinese firms have been investing in U.S. biotech companies, in part, to get access to health data and technology. BGI states on its website it’s been developing partnerships with U.S. hospitals and biotech firms. People don’t seem to know the value of their own genetic material, says Evanina. “It’s your past and your future as well as your children’s future. It’s very risky and I think the unknown is probably the riskiest part.”   

It’s not just China that is interested in collecting the biological data of American citizens.  Wertheim reached out to the nation’s largest genealogy firms to get their perspective on the security of Americans’ health data. Anne Wojcicki, CEO of 23&Me, responded to questions about whether the true value of these genealogy companies lies in the health data they are collecting. “What we have done is we have empowered individuals with this opportunity to come together, to crowd source research,” Wojcicki says. “And I absolutely stand behind: we are going to develop drugs. So that everyone is actually benefiting from the human genome. So absolutely the data is valuable.” Wojcicki agrees with intelligence officials on China. “We need to be super vigilant about China, you know, with any kind of data. But the issue is more that China is putting billions of dollars into their own genetic programs and we are not.”

But sharing your DNA with these companies is risky enough that the U.S. military recently issued a warning to all service members instructing them not to use direct-to-consumer genealogy tests, saying, “These genetic tests are largely unregulated and could expose personal and genetic information… Outside parties are exploiting the use of genetic data.”  

BGI Group declined to be interviewed, but said in a statement, “The notion that the genomic data of American citizens is in any way compromised through the activities of BGI in the U.S. is groundless.” The company identified itself as “a private organization,” which was “founded to benefit human health and wellbeing.”

Chinese hackers have breached the databases of American hotels, health care companies, a credit reporting bureau and the U.S. government; Chinese operatives have been stealing American technology for years. Nearly every American has been compromised already says Evanina. “You have probably five or six healthcare companies the last five years who have been, I would say, penetrated, exfiltrated, hacked by China,” he tells Wertheim. “Current estimates are that 80% of American adults have had all of their personally identifiable information stolen by the Communist Party of China.”    

In December, John Ratcliffe, then the director of National Intelligence, named China the number-one national security threat to America, citing its theft of technology and data. 


Source: CBS News

General Officer Assignments

The Pentagon
The Pentagon

Immediate Release

General Officer Assignments

Jan. 25, 2021

The Chief of Staff of the Army announces the following general officer assignments:

Lt. Gen. (Promotable) Charles A. Flynn, deputy chief of staff, G-3/5/7, U.S. Army, Washington, D.C., to commanding general, U.S. Army Pacific, Fort Shafter, Hawaii.

Lt. Gen. Bryan P. Fenton, senior military assistant to the secretary of defense, Office of the Secretary of Defense, Washington, D.C., to commander, Joint Special Operations Command; and commander, Joint Special Operations Command Forward, U.S. Special Operations Command, Fort Bragg, North Carolina.

Maj. Gen. Steven W. Gilland, commanding general, 2d Infantry Division (Combined), Eighth Army, Republic of Korea, to deputy commanding general, III Corps, Fort Hood, Texas.

Maj. Gen. Omar J. Jones, commanding general, Military District of Washington; and commander, Joint Force Headquarters-National Capital Region, Washington, D.C., to deputy commanding general, Installation Management Command, Joint Base San Antonio, Texas.

Brig. Gen. Edmond M. Brown, deputy director/chief of staff, Futures and Concepts Center, U.S. Army Futures Command, Joint Base Langley-Eustis, Virginia, to commanding general, Combat Capabilities Development Command, U.S. Army Futures Command, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland.

Brig. Gen. Thomas R. Drew, military deputy, Talent Management Task Force, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, U.S. Army, Washington, D.C., to director, Talent Management Task Force, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, U.S. Army, Washington, D.C.

Brig. Gen. Brett T. Funck, deputy commanding general (Operations), 10th Mountain Division (Light); and acting senior commander-Fort Drum, Fort Drum, New York, to deputy commanding general, U.S. Army Cadet Command, Fort Knox, Kentucky.

Brig. Gen. Clair A. Gill, deputy commanding general (Support), 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault), Fort Campbell, Kentucky, to director, Army Aviation, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-3/5/7, U.S. Army, Washington, D.C.

Brig. Gen. Guy M. Jones, deputy commanding general (Maneuver), 2d Infantry Division (Combined), Eighth Army, Republic of Korea, to deputy director/chief of staff, Futures and Concepts Center, U.S. Army Futures Command, Joint Base Langley-Eustis, Virginia.

Brig. Gen. Michael C. McCurry II, director, Army Aviation, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-3/5/7, U.S. Army, Washington, D.C., to director, Force Development, G-8, U.S. Army, Washington, D.C.

Brig. Gen. Mark C. Quander, commandant, U.S. Army Engineer School, U.S. Army Maneuver Support Center of Excellence, Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, to commandant of cadets, U.S. Military Academy, West Point, New York.

Brig. Gen. Jeth B. Rey, director, J-6, U.S. Central Command, MacDill Air Force Base, Florida, to director, Network Cross Functional Team, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland.

Brig. Gen. William A. Ryan III, senior advisor to the Ministry of Defense, U.S. Forces-Afghanistan, Operation Freedom’s Sentinel, Afghanistan, to chief of staff, U.S. Army Central, Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina.

Brig. Gen. Curtis D. Taylor, commander, 5th Security Force Assistance Brigade, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington, to commanding general, National Training Center and Fort Irwin, Fort Irwin, California.

Brig. Gen. Joel B. Vowell, deputy director, Strategic Planning and Policy, J-5, U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, Camp H. M. Smith, Hawaii, to commanding general, U.S. Army Japan and I Corps (Forward), Japan.

General Officer Assignments
General Officer Assignments

Source: U.S Dep. of Defense

Accurate List of 2020 Election Fraud cases shows 81 cases total, 30 still active – And NOT ONE SINGLE COURT has allowed evidence to be argued

The 2020 election will go down as arguably the greatest fraud in world history copia
The 2020 election will go down as arguably the greatest fraud in world history copia

By Sophie Miller

The 2020 election will go down as arguably the greatest fraud in world history. 

The tremendously popular incumbent candidate, President Trump, was easily
winning the race on election night in a landslide and then suddenly multiple
states took a break, quit counting, and by the end of the week the election was
flipped to Joe Biden.

Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here:

Then, as the President and his team attempted to address the fraud and alleged abnormalities, the courts
refused in any case evidence to be brought before a court of law.

We’ve heard over and over from Big Media that President Trump and his team lost numerous court cases linked to the 2020 election.  But this is not accurate.

Here’s what we identified from our research of an accurate and updated list of court cases:

  • There are 81 court cases to date based on the 2020 election
  • In 45 cases President Trump was the plaintiff
  • In 34 cases President Trump is not the plaintiff
  • In 2 cases President Trump is the defendant
  • In 72 cases illegal voting is alleged
  • In ZERO of the 72 cases where illegal voting is alleged has evidence been allowed to be presented
  • 30 cases remain active

Here is a 
link to the list of cases.
2020 Election Court Cases by Jim Hoft on Scribd

In the 2020 election:

  • Thousands of instances of fraud were alleged
  • Multiple states changed laws to provide for absentee ballots and the remedy is alleged to be not legal
  • The FBI to date has done nothing to review the alleged fraud
  • The DOJ denied any alleged material instances of fraud
  • The Democrats are accused of the alleged election fraud
  • The state legislatures certified their results with millions of ballots in question
  • The US Congress accepted these certified results which ignored the thousands of instances of election fraud
  • VP Mike Pence accepted the results despite state legislatures asking him to examine the results

And now we know the courts didn’t allow a single instance of evidence of fraud to be presented to date.

Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here:

Americans are livid with the actions that took place in the 2020 election and believe the election was stolen. There are numerous reasons for this.

Source: The True Defender

US Department of Justice
US Department of Justice


Source: The True Great Awakening.